how often do you really change the enterprise pom though? 

On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:24:25 Timothy Reilly wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
>  
> I just worked with a company converting 130+ projects from Ant to Maven. 
> LATEST and RELEASE were invaluable.
>  
> I do think there needs to be more thought around when they're allowed. No 
> artifact's "release" pom should contain SNAPSHOT, LATEST or RELEASE anywhere. 
> The later 2 should be extrapolated during the release build. But otherwise 
> they're really important to me during development. Why wouldn't I want to 
> point to parent pom version = RELEASE in my development poms? Or use the 
> LATEST plugin until it breaks something in a non backward compatible way? 
> Re-creating past releases and dependency trees it's a different story though.
>  
> It's a lot to ask a build and deploy team to update 130+ projects whenever 
> they release a new enterprise pom. What they'll do in practice is just change 
> it and force it over the current version or worse avoid making changes that 
> really should be done b/c it's too much hassle.
>  
>  
> 



-- 
Michael McCallum
Enterprise Engineer
mailto:gho...@apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to