On 17-Mar-09, at 10:10 AM, Brett Porter wrote:


On 18/03/2009, at 2:23 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:

Why are you changing core code in the RC branch after we have started the RC cycle?

Can we please leave the code alone in RCs and use the 2.1.x branch for any non-regression related changes.

See the concurrent threads - the change you quoted was an adjustment to the previous one based on Benjamin's assessment. The original change was to better inform users of a difference in compatibility for plugins between 2.0.x and 2.1.0 which is why I merged it. I also said that if this is the only thing left it can wait until 2.1.1 - I don't mind if these get rolled back from the RC branch at all.


Benjamin removed the plugin discovery listener?

- Brett

--
Brett Porter
[email protected]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
----------------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to