On Thu April 9 2009 2:10:03 pm Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi Dan, > > > Author: dkulp > > Date: Thu Apr 9 13:27:23 2009 > > New Revision: 763640 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=763640&view=rev > > Log: > > Fix an issue where classes only referenced as arrays are not being > > properly shaded. > > For the release notes, shouldn't there be a corresponding JIRA issue?
Possible. I THINK it's the cause of MSHADE-47 and thus MSHADE-47 may be resolvable, but I really don't have the time (or the hibernate knowledge) to verify that. I'm also couldn't reproduce it using anything small enough to be considered for a test case. Thus, I'm not even sure if the above description is really correct. I just know that in SOME cases, I was seeing something like "[Lcom.foo.Blah;" and "[Lcom/foo/Blah;" coming into the remapper which, from a straight naming standpoint, means arrays, but doing something like adding arrays fields/params didn't trigger it. Not really sure what was. -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://www.dankulp.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
