2009/4/16 Stephen Connolly <[email protected]>: > I've no issues with using excludes and not exclude > > of course the big issue I see is that all the goals in > maven-dependency-plugin have different properties doing exactly the > same thing! > > I have to say I like your syntax, as gives a way to specify a complete > set with one execution. > > the other syntaxes are not as flexible.... > > I guess I'm just looking for some "standard" way and a "standard name" > for these "standard" ways
The dependency:tree goal was written independently from the rest of the maven-dependency-plugin and added later, hence the discrepancy. I'm obviously biased as I also prefer my syntax :) Perhaps see what everyone else thinks and then we can move to a standard syntax. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
