I know and I was agree but we didn't do it. We didn't warn our users when we published 2.1.0 (or I didn't see it). Arnaud
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Brian Fox <[email protected]> wrote: > We previously already voted that 2.1.x would require 1.5. > > > Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > >> Bumping the Java requirement doesn't feel like a maintenance release >>> IMHO. >>> Therefore, shouldn't we bump the Maven version to 2.2 as well and rename >>> the >>> branch or create a new one? >>> >>> +1 It's a too big change for a bug fix release >>> >>> >> Arnaud >> >> >> > -- Arnaud
