> I actually think jamming all this into the JDK is a very > bad idea ...
Yes, I also strongly second this. What I ment was: OWB will need nothing more than a simple JRE and doesn't need additional J2EE libraries as it is defined in the JSR-299 Spec. All the headers are in javax.inject which hopefully will get the standard in a few years. LieGrue, strub --- Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr, 1.5.2009: > Von: Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: AW: Usage of spring (or better, the not so usage of spring) > An: "Maven Developers List" <[email protected]> > Datum: Freitag, 1. Mai 2009, 16:41 > > On 1-May-09, at 12:48 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > > > A little bit of self advertisement: > > > > why not consider OpenWebBeans [1]? > > > > You can work on whatever you like, you have access to > a sandbox. > > Personally nothing interests me except XBR and Guice. > Ultimately in two years it's not going to matter, there will > be some standard annotations and the decision about what is > underneath running is really not going to matter. > > > It is a best of all worlds approach, will get the > official Java standard for dependency injection and is an > Apache project (so no worry about licensing issues). > > > > OpenWebBeans extends the spec in the way that it also > can be used in a purely JDK environment. So we have already > moved out all JSF, JPA, EJB, JMS stuff into plugins which > get picked up automatically if they are in the classpath. If > not, OpenWebBeans will have no dependencies to any J2EE > stuff, ServletContext etc! > > Checkout the latest sources from [2] Apache SVN. > > > > I actually think jamming all this into the JDK is a very > bad idea and has done nothing but hamper Java. There's > nothing wrong with a small library you have to add to an > application. > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > [1]http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans > > please note that M2 have changed heavily and is much > more modular! > > > > [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/trunk/ > > > > > > --- Nick Stolwijk <[email protected]> > schrieb am Fr, 1.5.2009: > > > >> Von: Nick Stolwijk <[email protected]> > >> Betreff: Usage of spring (or better, the not so > usage of spring) > >> An: "Maven Developers List" <[email protected]> > >> Datum: Freitag, 1. Mai 2009, 3:48 > >>> We're never going to use Spring > >> > >> I don't want to get myself in the discussion about > the > >> blogpost or the > >> Sonatype / Maven discussion, but the above > sentence caught > >> my > >> attention. I have searched the mailinglist but > haven't > >> found any > >> discussion about the usage of spring and I was > wondering, > >> why not > >> Spring? > >> > >> With regards, > >> > >> Nick Stolwijk > >> ~Java Developer~ > >> > >> Iprofs BV. > >> Claus Sluterweg 125 > >> 2012 WS Haarlem > >> www.iprofs.nl > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > http://twitter.com/SonatypeNexus > http://twitter.com/SonatypeM2E > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a > rational > and technical order to justify his work and to be justified > in it. > > -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
