On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:22 AM, David Jencks<david_jen...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Brian Fox wrote: > >> Update: >> The new assembly plugin and the regex in the source bundle seem to be >> working great. I have just one thing to resolve that I had previously >> overlooked: The source archive must also contain license and notice >> files, even if svn doesn't. > > I don't have the quote handy but Roy stated pretty clearly that expected > checkout roots are sufficiently distribution-like to be required to have > LICENSE and NOTICE files in svn. >
I don't recall anything like that, in fact I understood the opposite, that the svn roots are not sufficient to be source releases. If that's the case, they can't be considered distributions and thus don't fall under the license and notice requirements. > So I think that verifying that the LICENSE and NOTICE files are there is > enough, you don't need to add them. > > thanks > david jencks > >> I need to understand better the default >> resource bundle processing and how to pull the right pieces together >> into the assembly. Otherwise we are pretty close to getting all this >> staged and released. >> >> --Brian >> >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Brian Fox<bri...@infinity.nu> wrote: >>> >>> Just to bring the thread back up in light of the recent discussions of >>> plugin releases: >>> John has taken over the assembly release that contains the fix I put in >>> for >>> the ASF stuff. I've been travelling a lot the past two weeks and haven't >>> progressed much on the poms. Tomorrow or monday I should have time to >>> take >>> the latest assembly stage and get the apache assembly descriptor and all >>> the >>> poms updated and tested out. >>> Note that the work we are doing here is to make it easier to define this >>> for >>> all maven (and later asf) projects and be inherited correctly. This does >>> not >>> mean that all pending releases must be blocked waiting for these changes. >>> You can make a source release quite easily with the existing plugin >>> versions. >>> It's also worth nothing that now we know about the requirement, we must >>> have >>> a source release, ignoring the requirement simply because we didn't know >>> it >>> was a requirement in the past isn't an option. >>> >>> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Brian Fox <bri...@infinity.nu> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:25 PM, John Casey <jdca...@commonjava.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Brian Fox wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 26/05/2009, at 11:11 PM, Brian Fox wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We're fixing the directoryscanner to allow regular expressions in >>>>>>> addition >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> to the ant syntax. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cool, but that's another release in the chain, right? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's already to go, John is staging it now. >>>>> >>>>> *Ahem* I'm still troubleshooting an IT issue dealing with these >>>>> regexes, >>>>> so once that's done I'll stage the release. Just didn't want anyone >>>>> thinking >>>>> they'd missed the vote thread. ;-) >>>> >>>> Yeah, that's what I meant ;-) >>>>> >>>>> -john >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
