Will the release notes contain any general justification for an upgrade? For example, can it highlight the major improvements between 2.1 and 2.2? or 2.0 and 2.2?
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Benjamin Bentmann<[email protected]> wrote: > John Casey wrote: > >> We've solved 28 issues for this release: >> >> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&styleName=Html&version=15103 > > The release history seems a little confusing. For instance, MNG-3538 was > listed but actually duplicates an unresolved issue. I think dups should > never have any fix version set, so that we can track the actual fix version > at the issue being duplicated. MNG-4167 is missing from the notes although > the issue has been fixed. Shouldn't we better close this and track the > unresolved POM interpolation issue at MNG-3057 (by re-opening) or a new > issue? > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-014/ > > +1, fly birdie, fly > > > Benjamin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
