My apologies. I thought it was a *static* factory class, not just a factory class. This is better. Thank you.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Paul Benedict<[email protected]> wrote: > It's not much of a factory if it has no public methods. I still have > to subclass AptSinkFactory to use it. The 1.1 release is very > inconvenient. > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Vincent > Siveton<[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> I guess that you speak about Sink. We decided to use a factory instead >> of. For instance: >> AptSinkFactory.createSink( Writer writer, String encoding ) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Vincent >> >> 2009/7/11 Paul Benedict <[email protected]>: >>> Just a small gripe: I upgraded from 1.0 to 1.1 and found it surprising >>> that the module constructors were made protected. Anyway, I subclassed >>> them privately to continue passing in my java.io.Writer. >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
