The command-line setting should win, IMO...but I don't think this is
really tested ATM...
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi John,
On 14/07/2009, at 6:40 AM, [email protected] wrote:
+ As of Maven 2.2.1, there are two ways to specify which Wagon
provider should be used: via the command line,
+ or in the <<<\<server\>>>> configuration section of the
<<<settings.xml>>>.
+
+*Command-Line Configuration
+
+ To specify the Wagon provider from the command line, simply use the
+ <<<-Dmaven.wagon.provider.\<protocol\>=\<provider-name\>>>>
command-line option, like the following:
+
++---+
+mvn -Dmaven.wagon.provider.http=httpclient clean install
++---+
+
+ This instructs Maven to use the HttpClient-based Wagon
implementation for connections to HTTP repositories.
+
+*<<<settings.xml>>> Configuration
+
+ To specify which Wagon provider to use for a particular server,
modify your <<<settings.xml>>> file to add
+ the <<<\<wagonProvider\>>>> configuration to your <<<\<server\>>>>
entry, like the following:
If both are given, which wins?
Cheers,
Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
