Jason, with about 140 issues solved, could you think about pushing out the next alpha? 9 issues seem to be lingering forever and I rather have them pushed to alpha-4 so the latest binaries are available. Things look pretty good.
Paul On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2009-09-01, at 6:44 AM, Sohn, Matthias wrote: > > I am interested in Maven 3 and searched maven.apache.org to learn more >> about it. >> Could you point me to the right place to dig into Maven 3 development >> since I couldn't locate it. >> >> I found some blogs at Sonatype but in addition I would be interested in >> the following: >> - is there a timeline for Maven 3? >> > > An exact timeline, no. We have a lot of plugin testing left we would like > to do, and a lot of testing of OSS projects using Maven 2.x. We want to > ensure that 3.x is a drop in replacement for 2.x. This is where most of the > activity is. Our ITs are looking very good, we are a good part of the way > testing plugins. But we need to be extremely proactive in hunting down > projects and running them in our Hudson grid to make sure 3.x functions as > expected. I honestly do not know how long this will take. > > >> - where can I find the sources ? >> - which is the right developer mailing list ? >> >> > I see Benjamin has already answered these questions. > > -- Matthias >> >> >> > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > http://twitter.com/SonatypeNexus > http://twitter.com/SonatypeM2E > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > {script:"/Users/jvanzyl/signature/signature.sh"} > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
