As fun as this discussion is, I think perhaps it has outlived not only
the subject line, but this list :)
- Brett
On 09/10/2009, at 2:32 AM, Albert Kurucz wrote:
If you don't like the term metasoftware, why would you like the
metadata?
Data has software dependencies (or data dependencies) just like
software.
Data is software. More about this:
http://www.dans.knaw.nl/nl/over_dans/factsheets/mixed_future_proof/
If it looks like a duck...
2009/10/8 Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]>:
Modello? Or any source/code generator?
:D
~t~
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Stephen Connolly <
[email protected]> wrote:
UML is a diagram about software
2009/10/8 Jörg Schaible <[email protected]>
Stephen Connolly wrote at Donnerstag, 8. Oktober 2009 15:56:
No because metasoftware would be software about software (which
makes
no
sense)
Actually it does, it's called UML :))
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]