As fun as this discussion is, I think perhaps it has outlived not only the subject line, but this list :)

- Brett

On 09/10/2009, at 2:32 AM, Albert Kurucz wrote:

If you don't like the term metasoftware, why would you like the metadata? Data has software dependencies (or data dependencies) just like software.
Data is software. More about this:
http://www.dans.knaw.nl/nl/over_dans/factsheets/mixed_future_proof/

If it looks like a duck...

2009/10/8 Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]>:
Modello? Or any source/code generator?
:D

~t~

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Stephen Connolly <
[email protected]> wrote:

UML is a diagram about software

2009/10/8 Jörg Schaible <[email protected]>

Stephen Connolly wrote at Donnerstag, 8. Oktober 2009 15:56:

No because metasoftware would be software about software (which makes
no
sense)

Actually it does, it's called UML :))

- Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to