-1 On 2010-01-29, at 6:15 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> > On 15/01/2010, at 1:45 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > >> >> On 15/01/2010, at 12:42 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: >> >>> Brett Porter wrote: >>> >>>> Perhaps we might only do it for 3.0 if that's the case (esp. since this >>>> has a very minor chance of incompatibility if the property is in use). >>> >>> Why has the version to be locked down in the first place? Is it to prevent >>> usage of a snapshot version? If so, I don't think this applies to 3.0 as it >>> prefers RELEASE over LATEST. >> >> Ah, I had forgotten about that. That was probably the main reason, but it is >> also valuable to protect the releases. I think these were ones we got bitten >> by before: >> http://markmail.org/message/if6sbrsvr2zrvkta >> http://markmail.org/message/fgopqlnnhuecfmnq >> >> We are likely more careful with the releases, but as it's something that >> immediately affects all users on a new release, it's probably a little >> disconcerting. > > Benjamin, others - any further thoughts on this? I'm still inclined towards > adding it. > > - Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > [email protected] > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl ---------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
