On Apr 30, 2010, at 3:59 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Henrique Prange wrote: > >> It did the trick. The solution worked for both Maven 2.2.1 and Maven 3, >> as you said. > > Glad to hear. >
Why don't we just proactively ignore the packaging in artifact handlers? >> Just out of curiosity, will the definition of a lifecycle extension >> change after Maven 3 integration with Guice is complete? > > Not sure what kind of change you exactly had in mind but the goal is to be > backward-compatible. Stuart McCulloch created a Plexus shim that makes Plexus > components like artifact handlers, lifecycle mappings, mojos and all the > other Maven bits work unchanged. > > > Benjamin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl --------------------------------------------------------- What matters is not ideas, but the people who have them. Good people can fix bad ideas, but good ideas can't save bad people. -- Paul Graham
