We're not changing tests, that's just not a good idea. New tests we can consider a newer framework and patterns, but we're not switching the old tests. That's not time well spent.
On Jun 7, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Jemos Infra wrote: > Hi all, > > I haven't received any comments on my suggestion to move to Junit4. I > find that still using Junit3 is ugly, it still relies on inheritance > rather than composition and it doesn't use the potentials of frameworks > such as TestNG (which has the ability of running tests in parallel, plus > many other features). I'm available to do some job, but I'd need > guidance as for the process, since I'm new to this tool from a > development perspective. > > Regards, > > M. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl --------------------------------------------------------- Selfish deeds are the shortest path to self destruction. -- The Seven Samuari, Akira Kurosawa
