On Aug 18, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>  I just rebuilt aether and maven3 and I have now : 14M/125M
>  We are really near of 9M/125M we have in beta2
>  Perfect !!!
> 
>  Let's go for a merge in trunk ??
> 

Yup, let's merge it all in and move forward.

> Arnaud
> 
> On Aug 7, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> 
>> Results I had yesterday were :
>> 
>> 3.0-benjamin (built yesterday) : 14M/2488M in 5:23.389s (It probably swapped 
>> a lot)
>> 3.0-beta-2 (downloaded few minutes ago) : 9M/125M built in 23.723s
>> 2.2.1 : 67M/136M built in 30s
>> 
>> I only built one module : 
>> http://svn.exoplatform.org/projects/ecms/trunk/packaging/wcm/ear
>> Its dependencies tree is horrible !
>> 
>> I used : MAVEN_OPTS = -Xshare:auto -Xms128M -Xmx4G -XX:MaxPermSize=256M
>> (In theory Xmx = 1G but I increased it to 4G to fix the OOME)
>> 
>> To build it and reproduce the issue you need this repo : 
>> http://repository.exoplatform.org/public/ (releases & snapshots)
>> 
>> I will try to open the debugger this WE if I find few minutes.
>> 
>> On Aug 7, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 07/08/2010, at 12:44 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The advantage is to do what I did this morning in few minutes. 
>>>> I found a OOME on Aether/Guice branch (reported to benjamin but not in MNG 
>>>> because it's not yet integrated) and then I validated it wasn't here in 
>>>> current trunk.
>>>> The problem is that I had to rebuild both of them hat users won't do.
>>>> Without the beta2 release, each time you'll have to check if the problem 
>>>> reported comes from Guice/Aether or from changes done for now in beta2.
>>>> It is more for you who'll work on it to easily ask a comparison.
>>> 
>>> I ran this over one of my builds out of curiosity. Not sure if this is 
>>> helpful, but maybe some datapoints.
>>> 
>>> 3.0-benjamin => 73m / 252m
>>> 3.0-beta-1 => 63m / 159m
>>> 2.2.1 => 129m / 252m
>>> 
>>> Then I checked just the following:
>>> 3.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOT + guice patch => 70m/218m
>>> 3.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOT => 74m/252m
>>> 
>>> The numbers are quite consistent, so it looks like the problem might have 
>>> been on trunk here, not the guice++ branch. Arnaud, is that also what you 
>>> see with trunk?
>>> 
>>> I quickly ran the first two with Yourkit and saw that in Benjamin's branch, 
>>> the memory grows faster at a consistent rate, but is still released at the 
>>> end. The retained memory is only the classrealms and JDK ZIP cache, which 
>>> basically is the same for beta-1. So more usage, but not a leak. No OOME, 
>>> but perhaps the project is not big enough to exhibit it. 
>>> 
>>> Nothing to particularly note on the garbage collection front. The non-heap 
>>> memory looks to be identical. Basically the same results running with a 
>>> clean repository to do more artifact operations. Scanning the allocations, 
>>> there's quite deep trees of allocations for Guice & the shim - but given 
>>> the results for the other snapshots I'm not sure that's an issue itself.
>>> 
>>> That's all I had time for, but I'll hold onto the snapshots in case they 
>>> help.
>>> 
>>> - Brett
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Brett Porter
>>> br...@apache.org
>>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> 

Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
---------------------------------------------------------

Selfish deeds are the shortest path to self destruction.

 -- The Seven Samuari, Akira Kurosawa



Reply via email to