On 3 September 2010 01:38, Barrie Treloar <baerr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I didn't want to hijack the other thread with my questions after
> reading https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-compatibility-notes.html
>
> Caching of Artifact Resolution Errors
>
>  Marker files are great!  Is there any documentation on what they
> are?  The maven-eclipse-plugin has the hack I added with marker files.
>  Standardizing on the marker file will be the first thing I do once I
> know what do use.
>
> Automatic Plugin Version Resolution
>
>  Now that plugin versions are expected to be locked down in the pom
> has the documentation been updated to describe how to manage the
> version upgrades?
>  For example there was a question on the list a while ago about a
> tool to check whether new versions of dependencies were available and
> to provide a report.
>

mvn versions:display-dependency-updates


>  Something like that for plugins would also be needed.  The benefit
>

mvn versions:display-plugin-updates


> of not locking them down was I got the latest releases without doing
> anything.
>  The downside was the build was not reproducible and if the new
> plugin had bugs I would need to lock down the plugin to the previous
> working version.
>  Some guidance on how to manage this lifecyle would be appreciated by
> less experienced build managers.
>
> Plugin Repositories > "Maven 3 aims at supporting a stricter
> separation between the compile/runtime/test dependencies"
>
>  Has the
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html
> > Dependency Scope been modified to define "test compile" and "test
> runtime"?
>  Without something like this dependency:analyze has false positives
> with test scopes and a lot of the benefit of checking is lost.
>  Is this possible and on the feature list?
>
> Cheers
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to