On 2010-11-01 23:50, Stephen Connolly wrote: > On 1 November 2010 22:32, Dennis Lundberg <denn...@apache.org> wrote: >> That is something we need to add to the process. But until the process >> has been finalized I think we should revert the svn moves. >> > > +1 > > In the absense of a process, since retirement is essentially an SVN > operation, then our commit first forgiveness second process is the > default. > > Since Dennis started the debate on a process, Commit-first is no > longer viable, so revert the changes
I've now reverted the changes in svn. > > -Stephen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- Dennis Lundberg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
