On 2 November 2010 12:08, Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org> wrote: > > On Nov 2, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > >> I think we should have a separate discussion on what our SLA with the >> Maven users should be / can be. >> > > I think following the Eclipse process is wise. We're not going to come up > with anything better. They have delivered consistently for 10 years on > schedule. We're open source but all of our users are enterprises and > businesses. Thus all of our contributions are going to come from these people > and there is an expectation of a release process and social contracts that I > believe Eclipse has gotten right. >
Call a vote, let's see what happens I am not opposed to the eclipse process, but rather than saying, oh nothing ever happens at apache, call a vote and lets see what happens, OK? -Stephen >> Once we decide on our initial SLA (we can always increase our SLA >> afterwards) then we decide what we can keep in agreement with that >> SLA. >> >> as for punishment, there is no point in punishment without hope of >> redemption. We would need a mechanism whereby the -1's who fail to >> step up and maintain their favourite plugins can recover their vote... >> and all that needs to be defined before we think about punishment >> >> -Stephen >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
