they can always reopen if they want after the issue has been closed if the 2nd weeks was too short
- Stephen --- Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the screen On 19 Jun 2011 00:20, "Stephen Connolly" <[email protected]> wrote: > +50 > > I say lets give each issue a ping, wait 2 weeks and close if no response > > - Stephen > > --- > Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense > words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the > screen > On 18 Jun 2011 23:30, "Benson Margulies" <[email protected]> wrote: >> I just looked at the 'blocker' issues. We have a variety of very old >> JIRAs here. None of the ones I looked at have a self-contained test >> case that would can be downloaded, run, and converted to an >> integration test, etc. >> >> What's the policy? My temptation would be to comment on them asking if >> the OP is still interested (in some cases, 5 years later), and, if so, >> can they come up with a repeatable test case, and if not close as not >> a real bug. >> >> I don't mind in some cases doing work to build a test case, but to go >> to all this trouble for a bug that was opened about maven 2.0.x, where >> it may not be that easy to reconstruct the critical components of the >> problem, seems a dubious use of time. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>
