On Sunday, July 03, 2011 7:19:36 PM Benson Margulies wrote:
> So, I'm a mostly a monkey here, but it seems very sensible to me.
> Perhaps Dan Kulp would chime in?

It sounds reasonable to me.   I know I copied one of the transforms into CXF 
at one point to make some small modifications.   If it could have been 
accomplished as a subclass of some sort, that may have been avoidable.

Dan


> 
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> 
> <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A number of feature requests [1][2] could be implemented in an elegant
> > way by introducing an interface (ResourceMerger, say) similar to
> > ResourceTransformer. I'm happy to dive in and provide integration and
> > unit tests for this change, plus implementations for the requested
> > features if the consensus is that it'd be a good change.
> > 
> > Opinions? Improvements? Objections?
> > 
> > Robert
> > 
> > [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHADE-96
> > [2] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHADE-91
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
-- 
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to