I'd probably suggest releasing the 1.x line as 1.0 pretty much as is (there wasn't much to finish other than the HTTP ping pong that Mark has taken over to 2.x). That gives a stable place for any minor releases to go from and all the dev can focus on the trunk.
- Brett On 06/07/2011, at 5:33 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > why not: > > 1. release > 2. make mvn trunk use it > 3. run whatever we have for integration tests > 4. 2.0.1 if anything serious turns up > > On Jul 5, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> wagon-2 contains almost 50% _more_ tests :) >> >> basically the following things have been done: >> >> * upgrade to java5 libs - that was not much, but we were able to upgrade to >> newer dependencies which don't support java1.4 anymore. >> >> * upgrade to junit-4.8.x >> * upgrade to httpclient-4. This mostly concerns wagon-http >> * a few fixes in wagon-ftp. Upgrade of the test infrastructure to a MINA >> based FTP server for the integration tests >> * upgrade of plexus and a few other plugins and dependencies >> >> that's basically it! >> >> I'd say wagon-2.x is the way to go. >> But it still needs a bit testing of course! >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> --- On Tue, 7/5/11, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> From: Benson Margulies <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: Next wagon question, beta? >>> To: "Maven Developers List" <[email protected]> >>> Date: Tuesday, July 5, 2011, 6:59 PM >>> I don't have enough information to >>> judge. What's the effort level >>> needed to finish 2? >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> question for me is if we like to push hard on >>> wagon-2.0 (which got love lately) or just like to release a >>> minor-bugfixed 1.0 first? >>>> >>>> LieGrue, >>>> strub >>>> >>>> --- On Tue, 7/5/11, Kristian Rosenvold <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> From: Kristian Rosenvold <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: Re: Next wagon question, beta? >>>>> To: "Maven Developers List" <[email protected]> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, July 5, 2011, 5:38 PM >>>>> +1 for 1.0. Version numbers are free, >>>>> beta on 5th year is ridiculous. >>>>> >>>>> Den 5. juli 2011 kl. 20:28 skrev Benson Margulies >>> <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> Why is wagon still all 'beta'. Could we >>> possibly make >>>>> the next release >>>>>> just '1.0'? It seems embarassing to me to >>> keep calling >>>>> this production >>>>>> code beta. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
