On 18/01/2012, at 7:59 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > Perhaps if the SCM was GIT instead of SVN it could be faster ? > It's not a short term solution but it can be another reason to use Git ASAP. > >
I think you misinterpreted a typo in Simone's email - it's the CMS, not the SCM. This isn't related to the SCM used by the project - infra are using svnpubsub to publish sites (which takes effect almost immediately, in comparison to the slow rsync process that we used to wait for). On 18/01/2012, at 8:19 PM, ant elder wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Simone Tripodi > <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi all guys, >> ASF requirements for new incubating podlings requires that sites are managed >> >> * via the SCM >> * via svnpubsub >> > > Do you have any links to something that says that, I didn't think > there were any Incubator rules about what poddlings must do for > websites. > http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html#svnpubsub Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter http://twitter.com/brettporter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
