No thoughts about this? Should I just create a new ticket for this :-)? Regards Mirko
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 21:16, Mirko Friedenhagen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-124 suggests a "Rule-scoped > fail property" as feature. My suggestion would be something like this: > - Add an optional qualifier per rule which differentiates between > INFO, WARNING and ERROR (same as the loglevels) and > - Make the rules log with this level on the console and > - Make the build optionally fail only if there were violations with > log level ERROR. > > For backward compatibility when no qualifier is given, rules will > default to ERROR. > > What do you think? > > Regards Mirko > -- > http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ > https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ > https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
