On 4/9/12 5:30 PM, Jesse Farinacci wrote:
Greetings,
That's mildly interesting, but what about other work which has already
been developed and would see real and practical gains for users? I'm
thinking about things in https://github.com/etesla
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:27 PM, John Casey<[email protected]> wrote:
I finally have some cycles free to work on Maven, and I'd like to spend some
time thinking about how we might tackle some of the bigger-picture things.
-Jesse
I'm fine with enabling Maven to make use of that, but I've experienced
firsthand the limitations of using external APIs for core Maven logic
without the option to swap them out. I'm personally not willing to work
on something that increases our dependency on software we can't
influence for core Maven logic.
I'm still interested in the build-tool space, but I don't want to work
on something that has externally-imposed architectural limitations that
we can't escape.
--
John Casey
Developer, PMC Chair - Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
Blog: http://www.johnofalltrades.name/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
