why not use jdk's own annotation processors (which get compiled by javac are we save ourselves an extra mojo execution)?
Milos On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > We use asm to collect annotations from compiled classes (so scope compile ) > Makes sense ? > > 2012/6/28 Milos Kleint <mkle...@gmail.com>: >> Hello, >> >> I'm in the process of rewriting the nbm-maven-plugin at mojo to use >> the new annotations instead of javadoc tags. It appears to be working >> fine, but I'm wondering why the retention policy is CLASS. Since it's >> only used to generate the xml file, it could be turned into SOURCE and >> the annotation dependency could be made "provided". Am I missing >> something? >> >> Regards >> >> Milos Kleint >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > Talend: http://coders.talend.com > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
