2012/9/14 Olivier Lamy <[email protected]>:
> As far I can see most git beginners use git as they use svn. (hey do
> you remember when you started git and fully break your local clone
> trying to merge some local branches: don't say to me it never happened
> :-) )

I crashed and burned. Badly. Multiple times.

> So our maven tooling must be accessible for the mass (sure extra
> options for geek/nerds is always welcome :-) ) and be operational for
> basic/daily stuff of majority of dev folks.
>>
>> As can be seen from the wiki, I am somewhat at loss for a good
>> branchless solution. I think the best solution is probably to support
>> "trunk only" when running branchless, effectively
>> just move all the checked out dependencies to SNAPSHOT and use trunk
>> for everything. I think we can call it svn mode ;)
> Yup again we must try to build the most generic plugin for most used
> scm (sure better to concentrate efforts on most populars: svn and
> git).

I think it's really ok to default to "trunk" mode (maybe unless you're
checking out a tag of the main project) it's the one feature I
remember very clearly I would've enjoyed the first time I (ever) tried
to change something in maven.

I remember the first time I checked out maven source code quite
clearly, I was checking out repositories like crazy and building just
more and more dependencies until I finally managed to find the one
thing I was interested in. At the time it felt like I had built half
the known universe of components before I reached my goal ;)
(And they all have similar-sounding names; hey; didn't I check out
archiver-archiver just 10 minutes ago ???)

Of course, workspace-plugin would keep the pom changes in the
top-level project as a separate commit, so it doesn't mess up the
actual changeset in the end. (We could support a "patch" command too)

Just my 50 Øre (0.5 Norwegian kroner, recently deprecated).

Kristian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to