On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Stephen Connolly < [email protected]> wrote:
> We should probably close MDEP-124 as WONT FIX given that there seems no way > to fix it... or at least the addition of a configuration element to allow > flagging specific dependencies as used even if they seem not. > either we close it as WON't Fix or we reclassify it as enhancement and we'll had some additionnal config entries to allow to ignore some deps (more a workaround than a fix but a clean fix doesn't exist) > > MDPE-166 also seems like it should just display a different output for > <scope>runtime</scope> namely something like "Unable to determine whether > used or unused as scope is runtime" > I can have a look at it but if it's not solved since several years I think it isn't so easy. I'm not sure we already filter dependencies by scope. I need to check. > > I think the above two "solutions" would be quick to implement and would > close the issues out. > > On 16 October 2012 14:18, Arnaud HERITIER <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > i would like to release the dependency plugin soon. > > There only too old issues not closed attached to the current version ( > > > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aroadmap-panel > > ) > > but I suppose they are migrated release after release without any real > work > > on them. > > I'm interested especially by this fix to use it as report ( > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP-366) and it has the perf > improvement > > with the plexus-utils upgrade (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP-377) > > Nobody against it ? > > > > Cheers > > > > ----- > > Arnaud Héritier > > http://aheritier.net > > Mail/GTalk: [email protected] > > Twitter/Skype : aheritier > > > -- ----- Arnaud Héritier 06-89-76-64-24 http://aheritier.net Mail/GTalk: [email protected] Twitter/Skype : aheritier
