Kristian Rosenvold : > Andreas; > > We have somewhat of a tradition for staying backward compatible om plugin > options. So normally we would add any alternate parameters in addition to > the existing (causing more code and duplication). > > I know I am probably massively disqualified because total lack of > "newcomer" perspective, but it seems to me like the proposed changes are > fairly minor in both gain and simplification. Additionally I see no future > needs that will make the existing scheme break in any fundamental way. > > There are strong relationships between all the fork/parallel settings and > I'm not sure increasing the symmetry on 'forkMode' is worth the cost. > > Kristian >
Fair enough. Perhaps we can pimp the online docs a bit, perhaps by adding a new example page that covers the whole parallel / forkMode topic, explaining what's working together and what not. I'm not shy and would step up making a draft if that's welcome... :). Andreas
