Personally I'd like to see it adhere to the original specification. Whether that's optimal depends on what development process is being used, as reflected in the comments.
Mark On 14 November 2012 21:44, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> wrote: > So what would you propose the optimal behaviour would be? > > On Nov 14, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Mark Hobson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I see Jason's suggested MNG-3092 [1] for 3.1.0, which is great, but as >> the comments show this is a political hot potato. I'm happy to apply >> my original patch if that really is the consensus? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Mark >> >> [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3092 >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder & CTO, Sonatype > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > --------------------------------------------------------- > > the course of true love never did run smooth ... > > -- Shakespeare > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
