On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> wrote:
>
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Do we have, right now, either:
>>
>> 1) A way of mapping java-commons-logging to the mojo log API, or
>>
>
> Do you mean commons-logging, JUL, or both? There are ways to adapt both to
> SLF4J.
The former, but it doesn't matter.
If I add a dependency, in a plugin, that uses commons-logging, I want
to map the log messages from that dependency to the mojo log, so that
they look right even with Maven 3.0.x. I appreciate that as of 3.1 I
can just use the usual jcl-over-slf4j (or jul or whatever) and the
messages will end up in the right-ish place, though not associated
with the mojo. I was hoping for
plugin code calls (e.g.) CXF code calls SLF4J calls
something-we-lack calls mojo log calls SLF4J calls SLF4J-simple (in
3.1)
and
plugin code calls (e.g.) CXF code calls SLF4J calls
something-we-lack calls mojo log calls whatever we have today (in 2.x
or 3.0.x)
>
>> 2) A way of mapping slf4j to the mojo log?
>>
>
> Mojo.getLog() feeds into SLF4J with the code on trunk.
>
>> ?
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Jason van Zyl
> Founder & CTO, Sonatype
> Founder, Apache Maven
> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
> and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
>
> -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
