It's easy enough to not push the tag, or blow it away.

So I'll just stage it again.

On Nov 25, 2012, at 3:46 PM, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> +1
> 
> 
> On 25 November 2012 23:09, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Christian Schulte <c...@schulte.it> wrote:
>>> Am 11/25/12 20:42, schrieb Jason van Zyl:
>>>> I wish RCs were useful, but I don't believe anyone really looks or
>> takes the time to even try anything until it's actually released.
>>>> 
>>>> It's not hard to make RCs. So if folks want them, not a problem, I can
>> roll an RC.
>>>> 
>>>> Anyone have an opinion?
>>> 
>>> Problem is (was?) with tags pushed to github ending up wrong. For
>>> example, the tag 'maven-3.0.4' at <https://github.com/apache/maven-3>
>>> just isn't the final 3.0.4.
>> 
>> I've always thought that one of the virtues of git was that the RM
>> could hold off pushing the tag until the release vote passes. If
>> people want to see it, we could push to a temporary vote repo to
>> expose it.
>> 
>> 
>> It's a pre 3.0.4-RC and there have been
>>> changes between that initial tag and the final tag in subversion, if I
>>> remember correctly. So tagging a 3.1.0 now, removing that tag and then
>>> re-creating another 3.1.0 tag is a bit problematic when the intial tag
>>> already got pushed to github.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Christian
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>> 
>> 

Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder & CTO, Sonatype
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
---------------------------------------------------------

First, the taking in of scattered particulars under one Idea,
so that everyone understands what is being talked about ... Second,
the separation of the Idea into parts, by dividing it at the joints,
as nature directs, not breaking any limb in half as a bad carver might.

  -- Plato, Phaedrus (Notes on the Synthesis of Form by C. Alexander)





Reply via email to