+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Baptiste MATHUS <m...@batmat.net> wrote: > +1, bump to JDK6 minimum for Maven. > > > 2013/2/6 Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> > > > I think we should at least have a minor version bump on core to > > co-incide... Though I think calling it maven 4.0 might be better (that > way > > we catch up with the model version ;-) > > > > On Wednesday, 6 February 2013, Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > As we are now in 2013, it's probably time to think about that (again). > > > > > > Reading [1], even 1.6 won't be anymore updated after feb 2013. > > > > > > Can we say we are safe to go to 1.6 as minimum required ? > > > > > > NOTE: That will probably need a vote. So depending on how the thread > > > move, I will start a vote (or not). > > > > > > Thanks > > > -- > > > Olivier Lamy > > > Talend: http://coders.talend.com > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > > > [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org<javascript:;> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > <javascript:;> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net > > Sauvez un arbre, > > Mangez un castor ! nbsp;! > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
