Hi guys, do you have figures regarding size and execution time? slower/bigger doesn't speak that much to help to choose a default config ;)
*Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/2/8 Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> > In general, I think that the default value should be whatever works in most > cases. Then we could have params for tweaking this (for better performance > e.g. in specific cases), but it would be up to the user to do this. > So, in this specific case, I think the default should be to recompress so > that it always works even though it might be a bit slower. > > /Anders > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Kristian Rosenvold < > kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > A lot of you seemed to have realized that the latest version of war and > > assembly have chosen the "fast" option over the "compact" option; and you > > actually seem to like it ;) > > > > https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-639 has been filed and > "fixed" > > which will revert the behaviour back to "slow" for both war and assembly, > > So what do you think ? > > > > > > Kristian > > >
