+1 good result without config is the default people wanting to tweak will learn how to do it, and how to get back to exact when they release, which requires some organization
Regards, Hervé Le vendredi 8 février 2013 08:43:25 Anders Hammar a écrit : > In general, I think that the default value should be whatever works in most > cases. Then we could have params for tweaking this (for better performance > e.g. in specific cases), but it would be up to the user to do this. > So, in this specific case, I think the default should be to recompress so > that it always works even though it might be a bit slower. > > /Anders > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Kristian Rosenvold < > > kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > A lot of you seemed to have realized that the latest version of war and > > assembly have chosen the "fast" option over the "compact" option; and you > > actually seem to like it ;) > > > > https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-639 has been filed and "fixed" > > which will revert the behaviour back to "slow" for both war and assembly, > > So what do you think ? > > > > > > Kristian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
