I now have a "real" windows pc to test that on - so I'll give it a spin before reverting/fixing.
Kristian 2013/2/12 Benjamin Bentmann <benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> > Dennis Lundberg wrote: > > "ExecuteJava" daemon prio=6 tid=0x0000000006a92790 nid=0x1078 waiting on >> condition [0x000000000a63e000..**0x000000000a63fa10] >> at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) >> at java.util.concurrent.locks.**LockSupport.park(LockSupport.** >> java:118) >> at >> java.util.concurrent.locks.**AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.** >> parkAndCheckInterrupt(**AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.**java:716) >> at >> java.util.concurrent.locks.**AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.** >> doAcquireSharedInterruptibly(**AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.**java:872) >> at >> java.util.concurrent.locks.**AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.** >> acquireSharedInterruptibly(**AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.**java:1179) >> at >> java.util.concurrent.**CountDownLatch.await(**CountDownLatch.java:199) >> at >> org.apache.maven.artifact.**resolver.**DefaultArtifactResolver.**resolve( >> **DefaultArtifactResolver.java:**528) >> > > Unless the decision gets made to require Java 1.6 for Maven 3.1+, I > suggest to revert 1a1fe6d50802713d969ed08d6fa06d**ec53cf90e9, thereby > allowing the thread pool to actually process its work queue. > > > Benjamin > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.**org<dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
