Hervé
here are few thoughts:
1) transitive concern is valid, but should not be enforced the way
it is now.
2) user properties on dependencies are a valid feature to help
plugin writers.
3) it would help to have standard api to extract these user
properties from <dependency>
4) it could be implemented as optional xsd entry for
<dependency>/<properties>
where <properties> is a modello component identical to the
<project>/<properties>
Thank you,
Andrei
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Dependency properties
From: Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri 05 Apr 2013 12:37:09 AM CDT
> what about the shortcoming described in the "Why there are no dependency
> properties in Maven2" article?
>
> Notice we're back at a the POM model question (+ compatibility and so on) [1]
> But let's start with understanding the need and how it can scale or not
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Moving+forward+with+the+POM+data+model
>
> Le jeudi 4 avril 2013 12:54:50 Andrei Pozolotin a écrit :
>> yes:
>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/FAQs-1#FAQs-1-Whytherearenodepend
>> encypropertiesinMaven2
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
