On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Stephen Connolly <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Moving discussion off the vote thread
>
> The issue with that is when using the Maven Release Plugin, you will not be
> voting on the released artifacts if you call it x.y.z-RCn, so you would
> need a whole new vote for x.y.z.
>

The /[vote]/ and the /SVN tag/ are called x.y.z-RCn, the artifacts in the
Nexus staging repo are marked x.y.z.

Gary

>
> We could go all Eclipse nutjob and force the timestamp into every release,
> e.g.
>
> 3.1.0.v20130529
>
> But that way madness lies in my view... In any case, we will see where the
> vote goes... and if there is a non-definitive answer, e.g. (-3 < ∑ binding
> votes < 3) then we can see what alternatives fall out of the mix.
>
>
> On 29 May 2013 12:10, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > FWIW, over in Apache Commons land this is how we handle things.
> >
> > When we prepare and tag a release for version x.y.z, it is tagged as
> > .../x.y.z-RC1. If the [vote] passes, the tag is copied to .../x.y.z. If
> the
> > [vote] fails, the tag stays as a record of what happened and the email
> > archives tell the story of why the vote failed. The next attempt is
> tagged
> > as
> > .../x.y.z-RC2, and so on.
> >
> > Some of this is detailed here
> > https://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexusand here
> > https://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Stephen Connolly <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > We have been using a policy of only making releases without skipping
> > > version numbers, e.g.
> > >
> > > 3.0.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.0.3, 3.0.4, 3.0.5, etc
> > >
> > > Whereby if there is something wrong with the artifacts staged for
> > release,
> > > we drop the staging repo, delete the tag, roll back the version, and
> run
> > > again.
> > >
> > > This vote is to change the policy to:
> > >
> > > drop the staging repo, document the release as not released, and run
> with
> > > the next version.
> > >
> > > Under this new proposal, if the staged artifacts for 3.1.0 fail to meet
> > the
> > > release criteria, then the artifacts would be dropped from the staging
> > > repository and never see the light of day. The tag would remain in SCM,
> > and
> > > we would document (somewhere) that the release was cancelled. The
> > "respin"
> > > would have version number 3.1.1 and there would never be a 3.1.0.
> > >
> > > This change could mean that the first actual release of 3.1.x might end
> > up
> > > being 3.1.67 (though I personally view that as unlikely, and in the
> > context
> > > of 3.1.x I think we are very nearly there)
> > >
> > > Please Note:
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedure.html#Check_the_vote_resultsdoes
> > > not actually specify what it means by "the process will need to be
> > > restarted" so this vote will effect a change either outcome
> > >
> > > +1: Never respin with the same version number, always increment the
> > version
> > > for a respin
> > > 0: Don't care
> > > -1: Always respin with the same version number until that version
> number
> > > gets released
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours. A Majority of PMC votes greater
> > that 3
> > > will be deemed as decisive in either direction (i.e. if the sum is < -3
> > or
> > > > +3 then there is a documented result)
> > >
> > > For any releases in progress at this point in time, it is up to the
> > release
> > > manager to decide what to do if they need to do a respin.
> > >
> > > -Stephen
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
> > http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >
>



-- 
E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to