You're voting for the wrong thing. It was already decided and announced that when we cut 3.2 after Sep 30th it would be 1.6
The decision is: should the next release be 3.2 or 3.1.2? To my mind that is a commit that Jason should just push and if somebody objects to the commit they get to maintain the 3.1.x branch ;-) On Monday, 7 October 2013, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > +1 to 1.6 for 3.2 > > On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > Given the vote we had about releases after September does anyone mind if > I update the source/target levels to 1.6 for the core? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jason > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Jason van Zyl > > Founder, Apache Maven > > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Dennis Lundberg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] <javascript:;> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] <javascript:;> > > -- Sent from my phone
