Le dimanche 24 novembre 2013 10:26:13 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > On Nov 24, 2013, at 12:19 AM, Manfred Moser <manf...@mosabuam.com> wrote: > >> By separating "consumption" and "production" metadata formats, we'll be > >> able to evolve production format more aggressively. For example, it > >> would be nice to have Tycho-specific configuration markup inside <build> > >> section. This is not currently possible because all poms must be > >> compatible with the same model. > > > > I like the idea of consumptions specifics. It would be great if we could > > agree/define some sort of standard on how to declare suitability for > > artifacts for certain deployment scenarios .. > > I don't believe this requires separate documents to support this.
true, this does not require separate documents but having separate documents helps separating concerns: building a project vs consuming its artifacts and descriptor for consuption will be: - a lot shorter than descriptor for building: not any plugin, for example - build-agnostic I'm pretty sure that separating descriptors will help us move forward and even better design things Regards, Hervé --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
