>
> Oh and if anyone asks why I thought of a moose?
>
> Well he's friendly... as long as you do things his way... if you try to do
> things your way... well let's just see who wins, you or the angry moose!
>

I'm really starting to like this moose guy! :-)

/Anders



>
>
> On 18 December 2013 11:28, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Here is a more serious suggestion...
> >
> > A moose... why not Maven the moose!
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/maven-3.png
> >
> > May need a tweaking...
> >
> > Here's a larger version
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/maven-3-big.png
> >
> >
> > On 17 December 2013 16:00, Stephen Connolly <
> > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> well if we do with Fred's McDonalds, the Apache feather needs some
> better
> >> integration with the globe as there is a shadow mismatch in my mashup!
> >>
> >>
> >> On 17 December 2013 15:48, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ok, then let me try to find some imagery... hm, google for maven, mkay,
> >>> click Images.... WOW
> >>>
> >>> http://screencast.com/t/tfc20w9RA
> >>>
> >>> I'd rather go to Fred's McDonalds... :D
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Stephen Connolly <
> >>> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Yes I know... this is not a serious suggestion...
> >>> >
> >>> > To understand my logic...
> >>> >
> >>> > When people cannot decide what restaurant to go to, the easy way to
> >>> get a
> >>> > suggestion is to point out that if no agreement can be found we will
> >>> just
> >>> > go to McDonalds... and not the good McDonalds either, but the dodgy
> >>> one on
> >>> > *that* street, the one Fred said to avoid...
> >>> >
> >>> > Somebody must have a better suggestion (and the Anteater was the
> >>> animal on
> >>> > the front of the O'Reilly book, hence my picking it... it being the
> >>> only
> >>> > thing associated with Maven image wise)
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On 17 December 2013 15:28, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > I think the picture of an AntEater can feed into the "which is
> >>> better:
> >>> > ant
> >>> > > vs maven?" debate. I would opt not to possibly offend the Ant team.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Stephen Connolly <
> >>> > > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > A better looking anteater...
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/maven-2.png
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/screenshot-2.png
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > I think that may exhaust the AntEater and downloading all the
> >>> internet
> >>> > > joke
> >>> > > > as far as my artistic ability can take it.... though I may try to
> >>> > rework
> >>> > > > the apache feather to fit better... and I could move off the
> tango
> >>> > colour
> >>> > > > palette that I have as my default in inkscape (it's default so
> >>> that I
> >>> > can
> >>> > > > keep with the tango theme that Jenkins uses for icons)
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > On 17 December 2013 13:45, Kristian Rosenvold
> >>> > > > <kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > > I'm speechless.
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > Kristian
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > 2013/12/17 Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > > the anteater sucking down the interwebs from apache using
> >>> Tamás's
> >>> > > text
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/maven.png
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > And a screenshot with it
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/screenshot.png
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > On 17 December 2013 13:38, Stephen Connolly <
> >>> > > > > > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
> >>> > > > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > Meh! I was just trying to get something that would stir
> >>> > > objections...
> >>> > > > > > > hence the strange kerning!
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > On 17 December 2013 12:46, Tamás Cservenák <
> >>> ta...@cservenak.net>
> >>> > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >> Don't want to stir too much here, but the
> >>> > > > > > >> http://oi41.tinypic.com/33bctw2.jpg
> >>> > > > > > >> is typographically incorrect (odd kerning and
> odd/different
> >>> > > > typeface).
> >>> > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >> Long time ago I made vector based Maven logo (for
> Proximity
> >>> > site)
> >>> > > > > that I
> >>> > > > > > >> thought I donated to Maven project...
> >>> > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >> That one could serve as a great starting point for
> >>> experiments,
> >>> > > just
> >>> > > > > get
> >>> > > > > > >> some vector drawing app (I used http://inkscape.org/en/to
> >>> draw
> >>> > > it
> >>> > > > > long
> >>> > > > > > >> time ago).
> >>> > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >> If not in ASF SVN, you can still access it from here
> >>> > > > (maven-logo.svg)
> >>> > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://github.com/cstamas/proximity1/tree/master/proximity-site-stuff/srcs
> >>> > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >> HTH,
> >>> > > > > > >> ~t~
> >>> > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Stephen Connolly <
> >>> > > > > > >> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >> > I came up with a silly logo just to kick things off:
> >>> > > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >> > http://oi41.tinypic.com/33bctw2.jpg
> >>> > > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >> > Here's how it looks with the fluido skin
> >>> > > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >> > http://i39.tinypic.com/1zoz3v9.jpg
> >>> > > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >> > And I am not suggesting that an Ant Eater standing on an
> >>> > Apache
> >>> > > > > > feather
> >>> > > > > > >> and
> >>> > > > > > >> > slurping down the internet is the logo we should run
> >>> with...
> >>> > it
> >>> > > > is a
> >>> > > > > > >> Worst
> >>> > > > > > >> > option that should spur a better version
> >>> > > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >> > On 17 December 2013 00:38, Jeff Jensen <
> >>> > > > > > >> jeffjen...@upstairstechnology.com
> >>> > > > > > >> > >wrote:
> >>> > > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > Looks good.  I like the left nav better tho!
> >>> > > > > > >> > > I don't think the Maven logo in the upper right corner
> >>> looks
> >>> > > > > bad/out
> >>> > > > > > >> of
> >>> > > > > > >> > > place, however, a new logo is fun to have!
> >>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Stephen Connolly <
> >>> > > > > > >> > > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > >
> >>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/w5eblhl4q0fzc6p/Screen%20Shot%202013-12-16%20at%2022.32.03.png
> >>> > > > > > >> > > >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > On 17 December 2013 00:16, Stephen Connolly <
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > > >> > > >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > > bollix gmail
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > > On 17 December 2013 00:11, Olivier Lamy <
> >>> > ol...@apache.org
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> Maybe only me but I cannot see the image :-)
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> On 17 December 2013 09:35, Stephen Connolly <
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> > wrote:
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> > I have been playing with reworking our front
> >>> > > > page...[image:
> >>> > > > > > >> Inline
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> images
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> > 1]
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> > I think the fluido skin is a big improvement, I
> >>> would
> >>> > > > like
> >>> > > > > to
> >>> > > > > > >> > switch
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > to
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> > that...
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> > Only problem I see is that our current logo(s)
> >>> are
> >>> > very
> >>> > > > > tied
> >>> > > > > > to
> >>> > > > > > >> > the
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > old
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> > look and feel...
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> > So do we want to see about launching a logo
> >>> > > competition.
> >>> > > > > > TomEE
> >>> > > > > > >> had
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > good
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> > success with theirs.
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> > Also I'm looking at going with the top-menu
> >>> version
> >>> > of
> >>> > > > > fluido
> >>> > > > > > >> skin
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> rather
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> > than the left menu... I have a solution to the
> >>> > "hidden"
> >>> > > > > > >> nature...
> >>> > > > > > >> > > but
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> > you'll just have to wait until I sync up with
> >>> Hervé
> >>> > to
> >>> > > > > find a
> >>> > > > > > >> way
> >>> > > > > > >> > to
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> get it
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> > pushed to staging from a branch without blowing
> >>> up
> >>> > the
> >>> > > > > > >> production
> >>> > > > > > >> > > site
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> to
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> > see my trickery!
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> > -Stephen
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> --
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> Olivier Lamy
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >> http://twitter.com/olamy |
> >>> > http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >> > > >
> >>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > --
> >>> > > Cheers,
> >>> > > Paul
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to