Yup, I agree. On Jan 6, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote:
> yes but keep the dash between the mng and the mng number > > > On 6 January 2014 15:24, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 On the original name >> >> I just made another IT and it's definitely much clearer with the JIRA id >> and a short blurb. I see this as an improvement. >> >> On Jan 6, 2014, at 7:51 AM, Igor Fedorenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Stephen, >>> >>> I would prefer to keep the original test name, i.e. >>> mng5530-mojo-execution-scope. Having both the JIRA issue id and short >>> description of the test makes it much easier to understand what the test >>> is supposed to do and still be able to find any additional information >>> if needed. >>> >>> Can you explain what problems you see with the original test name? >>> >>> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven-integration-testing.git;a=commit;h=d4f4d4009d23a77254c20d4c2c8a2b8eccc91e47 >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Igor >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jason >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> Jason van Zyl >> Founder, Apache Maven >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl ---------------------------------------------------------
