>
> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5356 Make encrypt/decrypt logic
> pluggable
>
>     Seems like something that could be in scope. Any takers?
>

We already have a (I think) working fix for this in the git repo linked to
in the comments. However, jvz suggested moving this to a separate component
which would be some extra work/thinking.

I did move this to the 4.x line as I'm not sure how much time I have to put
into this the near future. But it could always be moved back to 3.2. It
would be very good to get in there.

/Anders


>
> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5389AbstractMavenLifecycleParticipant
> need a afterSessionEnd
>
>     ACTION: jvzyl to provide status update
>
> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3092 Version ranges with
> non-snapshot
> bounds can contain snapshot versions
>
>     Do we have a decision as to what we will do with this one? It is one of
> the longest discussions we have...
>
>
> On 7 January 2014 15:55, Stephen Connolly
> <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3695 Allow dependencies' scopes to
> > be managed without explicit versions
> >
> >     This does not affect the pom schema, but potentially affects other
> POM
> > parsers. My instinct is that this is for 4.x not 3.2
> >
> > * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3321 Skip plugin and/or execution
> >
> >     After reading more closely, this seems to be changing the POM schema,
> > at least with the current patch, move to 4.x?
> >
> > * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3124 Inherit mailing lists from
> > parent POM
> >
> >     Sounds like an issue building the internal model. Additionally this
> > would not be a change that affects other consumers and their processing
> of
> > dependencies, so this looks like a valid candidate to me.
> >
> > * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2807 ciManagement from parent is
> > not merging with children
> >
> >     Same as MNG-3124. Both issues are related it would seem
> >
> > * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3825 Dependencies with classifier
> > should not always require a version.
> >
> >     Same as MNG-3695
> >
> > * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4173 Remove automatic version
> > resolution for POM plugins
> >
> >     This is somewhat reasonable, but we have already kicked this can down
> > the road and it may hinder adoption. I would be happy to kick this one to
> > 4.x on the basis that most existing poms were written with the assumption
> > that you could avoid specifying the plugin version... and we even omit
> the
> > plugin version in the asf parent pom for some stuff...
> >
> >
> > On 7 January 2014 15:45, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2478 add filtered resource
> >> directories to super POM
> >>
> >>     Moved to 4.x bucket as requires pom model change
> >>
> >> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-426 create "maxmem" setting for
> >> all plugins to refer to
> >>
> >>     I think this is now out of scope for core... but I would be
> >> interested in what others think
> >>
> >> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-683 Lifecycle mappings should
> >> specify phase bindings in terms of general functionality type
> >>
> >>     This issue seems DOA at present... do we want to push it out again?
> >>
> >> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-841 Support customization of
> >> default excludes
> >>
> >>     The issue as currently written seems to imply a pom format change...
> >> OTOH this could be handled by a standard property name. Probably more an
> >> issue for plugins that slurp directories or for the plexus utils that do
> >> this.
> >>
> >> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-193 symmetry for outputs of a
> >> plugin
> >>
> >>     Sounds like this is a Move to 4.x issue
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7 January 2014 15:39, Stephen Connolly <
> >> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2381 Improved control over the
> >>> repositories in the POM
> >>>
> >>>     Unsure what the ask is here
> >>>
> >>> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4506 Split site deployment URLs
> >>> into release vs. snapshot, just like artifacts
> >>>
> >>>     Moved to 4.x bucket as requires pom model change
> >>>
> >>> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3474 Add parameter --internet to
> >>> test Internet access with and without using proxy defined in
> settings.xml
> >>>
> >>>     Any takers... looks like a nice small feature to add
> >>>
> >>> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3879 Dependency map and
> >>> documentation
> >>>
> >>>     Moved to 4.x bucket as requires a pom model change
> >>>
> >>>     ACTION: bmargulies - split the issue and rename existing issue so
> >>> that the pom change is the title
> >>>
> >>> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4171 The XML resulting from a
> >>> property of java.util.Properties is a lot more clumsy than that for Map
> >>>
> >>>     Unsure what the ask is here... seems like it's really a plexus
> >>> compatibility layer issue
> >>>
> >>> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4622 Throw Validation Error if
> >>> pom contains a dependency with two different versions.
> >>>
> >>>     I think we risk breaking too much with this one, we already emit
> the
> >>> warning, and my view is that we should consider this as a POM
> specification
> >>> change... it was poor specification in 4.0.0 that lead to permitting
> >>> duplicate versions of the same dependency... OTOH for dependencies
> which
> >>> are resources, there may be legitimate reasons for two versions of the
> same
> >>> dependency... e.g. two versions of jquery webjars to be included in a
> webapp
> >>>
> >>> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2893 Update the
> >>> DefaultPluginManager to not use a project depMan for controlling it's
> >>> transitive dependencies
> >>>
> >>>     Seems like a legitimate bug we should consider?
> >>>
> >>> * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2916 Default message and profile
> >>> help messages
> >>>
> >>>    Moved to 4.x bucket as requires pom model change
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 7 January 2014 15:25, Stephen Connolly <
> >>> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> OK we are now at 38 open issues.... anyone else feel like scrubbing
> >>>> some more?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 7 January 2014 15:25, Stephen Connolly <
> >>>> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Done
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 7 January 2014 14:43, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Seems reasonable. Go for it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Jan 7, 2014, at 7:43 AM, Stephen Connolly <
> >>>>>> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> > AFAIU this is the current list of bugs:
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MNG%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%223.2%22%20AND%20(status%20%3D%20Open%20OR%20status%20%3D%20%22In%20Progress%22%20or%20status%3DReopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > I propose that the following issues all require a change to the
> >>>>>> model
> >>>>>> > version, and thus should be pushed back to 4.0.0 (or later)
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1977 Global dependency
> >>>>>> > exclusions<http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1977>
> >>>>>> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2297 Change the POM to use
> >>>>>> > attributes<http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3397>
> >>>>>> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5102 Mixin POM
> >>>>>> > fragments<http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5102>
> >>>>>> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2199 Version ranges not
> >>>>>> supported for
> >>>>>> > parent artifacts <http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2199>
> >>>>>> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2216 Add default encodings
> >>>>>> section to
> >>>>>> > POM <http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2216>
> >>>>>> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3826 Add profile activation
> >>>>>> when
> >>>>>> > project version matches a regex <
> >>>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3826>
> >>>>>> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2316 Add info to the poms for
> >>>>>> > dependencies that implement an API or provide other dependencies
> >>>>>> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3326 Profile Deactivation
> >>>>>> Configuration
> >>>>>> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2557 Various enhancements to
> >>>>>> profiles
> >>>>>> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2598 Profile element in POM
> >>>>>> should
> >>>>>> > support overriding project.build.directory (WONTFIX candidate?)
> >>>>>> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3726 Extend POM model to
> >>>>>> support
> >>>>>> > declaration of IRC channels
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > The following issues require that the deployed pom be different
> >>>>>> from the
> >>>>>> > on-disk pom, i.e. the same problem we had with 2.1.0 and 2.2.0...
> >>>>>> again I
> >>>>>> > think these should be pushed back to 4.0.0 (or later)
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-624 Automatic parent
> >>>>>> > versioning<http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-624>
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > I would propose that we move these issues into a 4.0 bucket...
> that
> >>>>>> will
> >>>>>> > bring us down to 31 issues open for 3.2.0
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > Thoughts?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Jason
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> Jason van Zyl
> >>>>>> Founder,  Apache Maven
> >>>>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to