https://github.com/orfjackal/retrolambda


2014/1/13 Stephen Connolly <[email protected]>

> We are gearing up for the release of Maven 3.2.0... wherein we will drop
> support for Java 1.5 as the runtime that Maven requires (we will still
> support compiling and running tests with older JVMs via toolchains though)
>
> This means we will effectively enter a realm of "1 and 1 back"
>
> Do we want to switch to this as a policy?
>
> i.e. something like: "When a new Major/Minor line is released, the JVM
> requirements for running Maven will be the latest current Oracle JVM
> version and the previous Oracle JVM version or any JVM version compatible
> with such"
>
> Which could mean that Maven 4.0 would be Java 7 as a minimum requirement
> (assuming Java 8 were released before we get to our 4.0)
>
> (I know Chris is going to chime in and point out that IBM is still
> supporting various versions of Java on different platforms... and RedHat
> has pledged to support OpenJDK 6 as long as its customers want/pay it to)
>
> Anyway... just some thoughts
>
> P.S.
>   I would really love to be able to use the Java 8 features in Maven
> core... "1 and 1 back" still leaves us until Java 9 before we can do
> that... which is a good 2-3 years away from now... unless somebody
> implements a retroweaver to Java 7 (which at least stands a good chance),
> hence why I would like to drive us to Java 7 as a minimum once Java 8 is
> released.
>

Reply via email to