> On July 24, 2013, 3:04 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > jenkins/src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/mesos/MesosCloud.java, line 114
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/12847/diff/1/?file=325382#file325382line114>
> >
> >     Is ""+numExecutors a good node description?

it is not a description, it is the number of executors passed as string. in the 
subsequent review, we pass this as a int.


> On July 24, 2013, 3:04 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > jenkins/src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/mesos/MesosSlave.java, lines 
> > 80-91
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/12847/diff/1/?file=325384#file325384line80>
> >
> >     I don't know what this stuff does, but ok :)

jenkins magic! you don't want to know :)


- Vinod


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12847/#review23730
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 23, 2013, 8:22 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12847/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 23, 2013, 8:22 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Bunch of fixes.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   jenkins/src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/mesos/MesosCloud.java 
> 63f218ba41cc80fd22a8f2b38de22776f1caf056 
>   
> jenkins/src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/mesos/MesosRetentionStrategy.java 
> 17da814cc094bbe06539dc81875ad732b18ae417 
>   jenkins/src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/mesos/MesosSlave.java 
> eed0ba3d2f58864b10fb219b9080a5a9d4b0ce31 
>   
> jenkins/src/main/resources/org/jenkinsci/plugins/mesos/MesosSlave/configure-entries.jelly
>  24448a8325d1d680b4d22a336b5d5a42e7d869e1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12847/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make jenkins && mvn hpi:run
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to