> On July 25, 2013, 9:18 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > Note that this would be removed once we make a change in the backend to > > remove from completedFrameworks when a framework re-registered. Feel free > > to file a ticket against me. > > > > The original bug is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-417, but is > > that one now fixed? If so, do you know the review / commit where it was > > fixed?
I believe MESOS-417 is still an issue. I will submit this change and comment in the Jira issue about the fix that is needed. - Ross ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12834/#review23872 ----------------------------------------------------------- On July 23, 2013, 2:15 a.m., Ross Allen wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12834/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 23, 2013, 2:15 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos. > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > Iterate frameworks successively to save concat > > `concat` concatenates two Arrays and returns a new Array. `frameworks` > and `completed_frameworks` can be iterated successively to save > allocation of a new Array that is thrown away after finding the current > framework. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/webui/master/static/js/controllers.js > dae12b61001ff0c7379169242e5d125ef6ca141b > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12834/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Ross Allen > >
