Fwiw - I always encourage folks to bump and announce / permanently post a rev is bad instead of mutating it. Jars that mutate under a given coordinate cause alot of pain and are to be avoided in principle it seems to me.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Matei Zaharia <[email protected]>wrote: > Unfortunately I believe it's quite hard to delete published JARs from > Maven because of the signature files there -- you might need to make a new > release number. However, you can try asking Apache infra. > > Matei > > On Jul 29, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Vinod Kone <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Does anyone on the list know what is the policy for deleting already > > published (and likely mirrored) jars in apache repository. > > > > We would like to upload jars built to java 6 instead of java 7. > > > > thanks, > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Vinod Kone <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> +mesos-dev > >> > >> Hey Andy, > >> > >> Looks like we have been (unintentionally?) publishing mesos jars > (starting > >> from mesos-0.10.0) compiled to java 7 bytecode, to the apache maven > repo. > >> AFAIK, we are not using any java 7 features. So, I propose we compile > the > >> jars to java 6 and upload them. We should probably update our build tool > >> chain to make this explicit. I'm sure there is an option somewhere in > mvn > >> to the set the target byte code. > >> > >> Does that make sense? > >> > >> P.S: Not sure what is the apache policy for deleting publicly published > >> jars. > >> > > -- John Sirois 303-512-3301
