-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16436/#review31157
-----------------------------------------------------------



configure.ac
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/16436/#comment59528>

    os module seems to be unused?



configure.ac
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/16436/#comment59526>

    Is setting PYTHON env variable to a non-default distribution also an option?


- Vinod Kone


On Jan. 3, 2014, 11:03 a.m., TILL TOENSHOFF wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/16436/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 3, 2014, 11:03 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-799
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-799
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This autoconf check does a rather complex test for covering MESOS-799. It 
> builds and test-runs a minimal egg that links against a static library that 
> imports a standard C++ library object. A static library (built using the 
> standard mesos build settings) is needed in this puzzle because the egg 
> producing distutils possibly use slightly different build settings (derived 
> from python-config). 
> If that check succeeds, we can be rather sure that the mesos-egg itself will 
> be functional from a build-env point of view. When this test fails, the user 
> is given a sort of explanation and a hint to work around the issue.
> 
> Note that this check is performed regardless of the base OS. The error 
> message however is OS specific.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configure.ac f69908a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16436/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./bootstrap ./configure - all on linux and OSX 10.9 (with and without clang, 
> with and without default python)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> TILL TOENSHOFF
> 
>

Reply via email to