[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13906204#comment-13906204
]
Ian Downes commented on MESOS-996:
----------------------------------
No, the current code is not and the refactor proposed here is minor and would
not address the NWO. I read the doc and the suggestion is in the near term to
continue manipulating cgroups directly. However, we should definitely start to
think about the necessary abstractions for Mesos to work on systems with and
without systemd.
> Refactor linux/cgroups functions for separate subsystem mounts.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MESOS-996
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-996
> Project: Mesos
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: isolation
> Affects Versions: 0.18.0
> Reporter: Ian Downes
> Priority: Minor
>
> 0.18.0 requires each cgroup subsystem to be mounted separately, e.g., a
> container's cgroup would be:
> {noformat}
> {cgroups_hierarchy}/cpu/{cgroups_root}/container1
> {noformat}
> It would be much cleaner if the cgroups abstraction understood this and
> generally worked with the 3-tuple (hierarchy, subsystem, cgroup) rather than
> the existing tuple (hierarchy, cgroup).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
