> On March 12, 2014, 8:48 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote: > > src/master/flags.hpp, line 66 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/19135/diff/1/?file=517562#file517562line66> > > > > It's not clear that we're adding anything with > > 'registry_strict_operations' versus just 'registry_strict'. We also see > > 'strict' in play with slave recovery and they meaning is similar, i.e., > > should one take action based on the persisted information or not?
I went back and forth on this one, I like the symmetric meaning of "strict" with the slave, so this sounds good to me. - Ben ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19135/#review36985 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 12, 2014, 6:36 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/19135/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 12, 2014, 6:36 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-764 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-764 > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > Initial commits of the Registrar integration with the Master will be used > with (1) InMemoryStorage and (2) non-strict operations. > > This is the review for (2). > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/master/flags.hpp 012eb5a502938fdcc9bb52189e9e42ca6e3c5da7 > src/master/main.cpp a99fb6494f1dbbfce91698d5aaded2b982bbaab5 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19135/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Ben Mahler > >
